User:Geographyinitiative/Wiktionary:Entry Assessment
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Assements of Entrys/Senses
A page for developing a scheme for assessing entries/senses
These entries/senses likely pass WT:ATTEST.
Authoritative Quality
[edit]- Has Authoritative References; Has Ten Independent Cites with confirmed OCLC
- Beijing, Chungking, Taipei
Good Quality
[edit]- Has Five Independent Cites with confirmed OCLC
- Chungnanhai
Basic Valid
[edit]- Likely meets bare minimum of OCLC cites to prevent failure at RFV
- Tsao-yang, Tsao-chuang, Zawa, Zengdu, Chapei, Chang-chia-k'ou, Kalgan, Zhangwan, Jhangjhou, Zhangzi, Ch'ang-tzu, Zhanhe
Poor Coverage ("Validity Unverified")
[edit]At this time, these entries/senses would be assumed to pass WT:ATTEST by "clearly widespread use". If they fail to appear in Google N-grams, should be considered for RFV.
Weak Pass
[edit]- May have enough material to pass two week discussion
- Tsaochuang
Approx 2 Valid Cites
[edit]Approx 1 Valid Cites
[edit]- Nascent
- Zangguy, Zaozhuang, Zhabei, Zhang, Zhangjiaji, Zhangjiajie, Zhangjiakou, Changkiakow, Zhangpu, Zhangqiao, Zhangye