Talk:Gene
Latest comment: 10 years ago by -sche in topic Gene
Deletion debate[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense for "Genoa" and "jean" (both labeled as archaic). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- What counts as verification? Merriam-Webster? LlywelynII (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- See WT:ATTEST. Other dictionaries do not count, and for good reason. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- And the link doesn't mention those two definitions. D'oh. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- LlywelynII, surely your only source is not that page? If so you've confused etymology with definitions. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- And the link doesn't mention those two definitions. D'oh. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- See WT:ATTEST. Other dictionaries do not count, and for good reason. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)